cerumen removal

Kevin Pons kpons at byelectric.com
Wed Sep 23 23:04:40 EST 1998


This is a multi-part message in MIME format.

------=_NextPart_000_0004_01BDE65B.C92FB000
Content-Type: text/plain;
	charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

If an Audiologist were to remove ear wax and perform a 92557, the =
Audiologist could not charge for the wax removal because it is =
considered a component of 92557.  If the Audiologist removed wax on one =
day and had the person return on a subsequent day for testing that would =
be problematic if the sole purpose of delaying the testing was to =
acquire two separate chargeable services. KCP

------=_NextPart_000_0004_01BDE65B.C92FB000
Content-Type: text/html;
	charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD W3 HTML//EN">
<HTML>
<HEAD>

<META content=3Dtext/html;charset=3Diso-8859-1 =
http-equiv=3DContent-Type>
<META content=3D'"MSHTML 4.72.3110.7"' name=3DGENERATOR>
</HEAD>
<BODY bgColor=3D#ffffff>
<DIV><FONT color=3D#000000 size=3D2>If an Audiologist were to remove ear =
wax and=20
perform a 92557, the Audiologist could not charge for the wax removal =
because it=20
is considered a component of 92557.&nbsp; If the Audiologist removed wax =
on one=20
day and had the person return on a subsequent day for testing that would =
be=20
problematic if the sole purpose of delaying the testing was to acquire =
two=20
separate chargeable services. KCP</FONT></DIV></BODY></HTML>

------=_NextPart_000_0004_01BDE65B.C92FB000--





More information about the Audiolog mailing list