better than eSeq for licor

[Paul Weston]

In article <8l83uh$qld$1 at mercury.hgmp.mrc.ac.uk>,
	felipe wettstein <felipe at spin.ch> writes:
> hi
> 
> our new sequencer (licor) was not shipped with a good base calling
> software (eseq). it looks crappy, is extremely slow, and a lot of thing
> do not work automatic (for example, find the lanes well, define several
> points for the lanes, print the trace files of all the samples..). do
> you know what software is good, i think we would even have enough money
> to buy something cheap.

I would investigate Phred, Phrap, Consed, and the Staden package.

Paul

-- 
Paul Weston: pweston at hgmp.mrc.ac.uk
Not speaking for the MRC