better than eSeq for licor

Paul Weston pweston at
Fri Jul 21 03:31:19 EST 2000

In article <8l83uh$qld$1 at>,
	felipe wettstein <felipe at> writes:
> hi
> our new sequencer (licor) was not shipped with a good base calling
> software (eseq). it looks crappy, is extremely slow, and a lot of thing
> do not work automatic (for example, find the lanes well, define several
> points for the lanes, print the trace files of all the samples..). do
> you know what software is good, i think we would even have enough money
> to buy something cheap.

I would investigate Phred, Phrap, Consed, and the Staden package.


Paul Weston: pweston at
Not speaking for the MRC          

More information about the Autoseq mailing list