John A Mess
jamess at athena.mit.edu
Fri Dec 6 14:06:57 EST 1991
In article <1991Dec4.083835.23158 at nic.funet.fi> harper at convex.csc.FI (Rob Harper) writes:
>In <1991Dec4.043820.7565 at alw.nih.gov> donnel at helix.nih.gov (Donald A. Lehn) writes:
>> I'm afraid that you will be hard pressed to compress these files.
>>I'm pretty sure that they are TIFF files and as such are about as
>>compressed as they can get. (You can compress the header info though and
>>that is how you squeezed the 3Mb out of the file.)
>This is also true for GIF files, they are already compressed, so there is
>not much point trying to compress them further... and in some cases if
>you do try it you will get a BIGGER file than you started with.
I am not an authority, however I have been following the ongoing discus-
sions in alt.sources.pixutils, alt.comp.graphics, etc. regarding this
issue. From what I've gleaned, JPEG utilities can lead to an 18:1 com-
pression with small loss and higher compressions for greater loss of
picture quality. Since JPEG is 24bit/pixel based, it should be relatively
small visual loss. The PBM utilities available by ftp offer many form
conversions. You might want to tap their expertise.
More information about the Bio-soft