Sequencher vs Applied Biosystems

Mark Duffield duffiem at aa.wl.com
Mon Nov 22 17:46:54 EST 1993


In article <scott.753808591 at darwin>, scott at darwin.life.uiuc.edu (Scott
Howard) wrote:

> Considering what an ABI machine costs, I find it hard to
> believe that anyone would quibble over an extra $300 for
> a resonably functional, BUG-FREE program.

Considering what an ABI machine costs, I find it hard to
believe that anyone would have to pay more for software
_required_ to run the instrument in the first place.

Maybe ABI should concentrate on providing relatively bug-free
software to collect traces and leave the analysis to people who
can do that well.  I EXPECT reasonable software to be provided
when I spend that kind of money.

-- 
Mark Duffield                       | duffiem at aa.wl.com
Sr. Systems Analyst                 | MDuffield at aol.com
Preclinical Scientific Computing    |
Parke-Davis Pharmaceutical Research | 
2800 Plymouth Road                  |
Ann Arbor, MI  48105                |




More information about the Bio-soft mailing list