Solaris 2.x on a Pentium? + UW SCSI disk prob
drhawley at concentric.net
Sat Apr 26 21:26:46 EST 1997
I have to agree with Steve. I've been on Pentium X86 for
two years and I'm as happy as a pig in mud. My main reason
to be honest is selfish, IMHO Solaris contracts pay bigger
bucks and are more redily available. :-)
I'm so happy with Solaris x86 I'm putting together system #2. :-)
If anyone has delt with Ultra/Wide IBM SCSI disks under
Solaris x86 2.5.1 please read my posting on comp.sys.sun.admin.
I need some help with SCSI ids over 7.
Steve Cole wrote:
> On Wed, 23 Apr 1997, Jennifer Steinbachs wrote:
> > Solaris 2.5 x86 may be stable, but Linux (esp. RedHat) is much
> > more stable, has much more documentation, and is FREE :)
> Horsepucks! Show me the UNIX manuals for Linux, and I don't mean the
> online ones! Show me more than a half dozen 4+ processor Linux boxes that
> have been up more than 90 days under fairly extreme mission-critial use.
> There's thousands of Sun boxes with those stats - hell, the Pentium Pro
> has hardly been out long enough to try to prove your point, and neither
> has Linux 2.x.
> Steve |President & Systems Administrator, Kingston Online Services
> |(e pluribus unix) Multiple-T1 URL: http://www.kos.net/
> |Business and Education partners in SouthEastern Ontario
> |"Through the firewall, out the router, down the T1, across the
> |backbone, bounced from satellite, it's nothing but net."
> |(forgive me if I'm terse, I answer hundreds of e-mails a day)
More information about the Bio-soft