Do we need THREE genome newsgroups?
francis at monod.Biol.McGill.CA
Mon Apr 12 13:36:03 EST 1993
CLARK at SALK-SC2.SDSC.EDU (Steve Clark) writes:
>I strongly believe that there should be a forum to discuss
>genome issues but there is a possibility that the groups could become too
>fragmented to be useful.
> So, let me propose, informally, that there be one genome newsgroup
>devoted to ALL aspects of genome science, for both eukaryotes and
>prokaryotes, for discussion of software, reagents, techniques, funding,
>meetings, yeast contamination of cDNA libraries, or whatever.
I like this idea, but Dave K. makes also the good point that:
> from kristoff at net.bio.net (David Kristofferson)
>It would certainly facilitate more inter-disciplinary
>communications, but would it result in a lot of people tuning out the
>newsgroup completely because they didn't want to read technical
>discussions of ACEDB software?!?!
To which I say ... lets just give it a try ... I think if there is a
general genome group, with a very broad mandate to deal with all
things to do with genomes ... we will get a big crowd involved, and
then, groups (ACeDB?) can splinter off.
| B.F. Francis Ouellette * francis at monod.biol.mcgill.ca *
| Manager, Yeast Chromosome I and XVI Sequencing Projects
| Biology Dept, McGill University, Montreal, Qc, Canada
| "Je cherche a comprendre" Jacques Monod
More information about the Bioforum