German "social status" still offensive
eanv20 at castle.ed.ac.uk
Fri Nov 5 05:08:41 EST 1993
hurd at fraser.sfu.ca (Peter L. Hurd) writes:
>I fear you may be right. Having children is _not_ an altruistic act.
>While I hate to drag evolutionary theory into this, anything which is
>altruistic entails some cost to reproductive success. Having kids is
>the antithisis of altruism.
Let's not confuse social and evolutionary altruism. Your definition
is the one that all biologists (including me) would agree on, but the
OED definition is ``regard for others as a principle of action;
unselfishness'' which is even wider than the behavioural
psychologists' ``helps you, harms me'' (i.e. Desmond Morris).
Nature has nothing to tell us about morality --- read SJ Gould's essay
`Nonmoral Nature' if you need convincing about this.
... John Woods
Forsan et haec olim meminisse iuvabit (Virgil)
[approx] Tr: The time may come when we will look back on these days and laugh
More information about the Bioforum