The Bigfoot Research Project
un691cs at genius.embnet.dkfz-heidelberg.de
Mon Aug 8 09:00:30 EST 1994
henri franzoni came up with several arguments why there is
so little 'hard' (or movie material) about the bigfoot (which
i won't repeat here. basically, he mentiones 50 reports, none on
film or on tape, or recorded in any other way. in short: we are
only dealing with eyewitness' reports again ! probably the most
unreliable kind of evidence available (as most judges or scientists
will be able to tell).
i think that the big foot science project is in essence unscientific !
they presume that there is a bigfoot, whereas they should presume
there isn't one. if you would analyze all the bigfoot eveidence
from that perspective, most 'objective' people would have to come
to the conclusion that the evidence simply is not convincing enough.
this is not the beginnings of a flame war (just want to stir up some
clemens suter-crazzolara, inst anatomy, heidelberg germany
More information about the Bioforum