re bionet.organisms.zebrafish

[Dr. S.A.J.R. Aparicio]

In article <2sojda$v0 at nmr-z.mgh.harvard.edu>, burglin at Frodo.MGH.Harvard.EDU (Thomas Burglin) writes:
> How about naming the group bionet.zebrafish
> the organisms doens't really add any information,
> nor does the hierarchy help getting there, these things are
> not like directories or folders on a computer, just newsgroups.

I don't agree. How would you then logically name a general discussion group for 
issues in comparative biology?
Also, a logically named heirarchy is much more informative to people scanning
newsgroup titles who are outside the field. 

Just my $0.02 worth


Sam Aparicio
saparici at med.cam.ac.uk