Interpretations - clean

Andrew Wagner afwagner at STUDENTS.WISC.EDU
Wed Mar 23 14:03:11 EST 1994


>Date:         Wed, 23 Mar 1994 09:44:31 -0600
>Reply-To: NAME <ECLEMENT at ADMIN2.MEMST.EDU>
>Sender: UGA Humor List <HUMOR%UGA.BitNet at wigate.nic.wisc.edu>
>From: NAME <ECLEMENT at ADMIN2.MEMST.EDU>
>Subject:      Interpretations - clean
>Comments: To: humor at uga.cc.uga.edu
>To: Multiple recipients of list HUMOR <HUMOR%UGA.BitNet at wigate.nic.wisc.edu>
>
>A KEY TO SCIENTIFIC RESEARCH LITERATURE
>        a: = What the writer said
>        b: = What the writer really meant
>
>a.      It has long been known that ...
>b.      I haven't bothered to look up the original reference, but ...
>
>a.      Of great theoretical and practical importance ...
>b.      Interesting to me.
>
>a.      While it has not been posible to provide definite answers to
>        these questions ...
>b.      The experiment didn't work out, but I figured I could at least
>        get a publication out of it.
>
>a.      The operant conditioning technique was chosen to study the problem ...
>b.      The fellow in the next lab already had the equipment set up.
>
>a.      Three of the Ss were chosen for detailed study ...
>b.      Results on the others didn't make sense.
>
>a.      Typical results are shown.
>b.      The best results are shown.
>
>a.      Agreement with the predicted curve is:
>        a. excellent    b. fair
>        a. good         b. poor
>        a. satisfactory b. doubtful
>        a. fair         b. imaginary
>
>a.      It is suggested that...It is believed that... It may be that...
>b.      I think
>
>a.      It is generally believed that ...
>b.      A couple of other guys think so too.
>
>a.      It is clear that much additional work will be required before a
>        complete understanding ....
>b.      I don't understand it.
>
>a.      Unfortunately, a quantitative theory to account for these
>        results has not been formulated.
>b.      I can't think of one and neither can anyone else.
>
>a.      Correct within an order of magnitude ...
>b.      Wrong.
>
>a.      Thanks are due to Joe Clotz for assistance with the experiments
>        and to John Doe for valuable discussion.
>b.      Clotz did the work and Doe explained what it meant.
>
-\/-\/-\/-\/-\/-\/-\/-\/-\/-\/-\/-\/-\/-\/-\/-\/-\/-\/-\/-\/-\/-\/-\/-\/-\/
      Perinatal Medicine...Saxophone...and whatever else interests me

                          From the e-mail desk of:
      Andrew F. Wagner                University of Wisconsin-Madison
      afwagner at students.wisc.edu

"I love getting mail--just the fact that someone licked a stamp for you is
very reassuring."     --Thomas Magnum, "Magnum, P.I."
-/\-/\-/\-/\-/\-/\-/\-/\-/\-/\-/\-/\-/\-/\-/\-/\-/\-/\-/\-/\-/\-/\-/\-/\-/\




More information about the Bioforum mailing list