dmeyers at panix.com
Fri Feb 10 18:25:54 EST 1995
In article <3hdia0$1c17 at teton.Mines.Colorado.EDU> dconley at teton.Mines.Colorado.EDU (Don Conley) writes:
Tony Cheek (tcheek at telerama.lm.com) wrote:
: Scott Currier (scurrier at nyx10.cs.du.edu) wrote:
: > Close... but instead of taxing to make up the short fall, they cut the
: > federal government back to what it was intended for... national defense.
: Almost there; the _federales_ should, optimally;
: 1. Print the money,
: 2. Raise the Army.
I might add
3. Provide for internal commerce(interstate highways etc.)
Close. But the term is _regulate_, not "provide for".
The idea being essentially to make sure that there aren't
tariffs erected between states which would hurt trade.
dmeyers at panix.com "Ah-ha -- That should do it!"
More information about the Bioforum