**poll**

[David Meyers]

In article <3hdia0$1c17 at teton.Mines.Colorado.EDU> dconley at teton.Mines.Colorado.EDU (Don Conley) writes:

   Tony Cheek (tcheek at telerama.lm.com) wrote:
   : Scott Currier (scurrier at nyx10.cs.du.edu) wrote:

   : > Close... but instead of taxing to make up the short fall, they cut the 
   : > federal government back to what it was intended for... national defense.

   : Almost there; the _federales_ should, optimally;

   : 	1. Print the money,
   : 	2. Raise the Army.
   I might add
	   3. Provide for internal commerce(interstate highways etc.)

Close.  But the term is _regulate_, not "provide for".
The idea being essentially to make sure that there aren't
tariffs erected between states which would hurt trade.

--D
-- 
---
   dmeyers at panix.com                         "Ah-ha -- That should do it!"
                                             "Damned computer..."