Peer Review: Reply to Dr. Mulaik
berezin at MCMAIL.CIS.MCMASTER.CA
Mon Jun 5 12:02:21 EST 1995
Thank you for your reply (below) - I, too, appreciate that
regardless of the views and interests, we both agree that
there are always "more details" for those who are willing to
look, listen and discuss the issues rather than stick to
the (often unfounded and arbitrary) belief systems.
Unfortunately, many (majority ?) of our "learned colleagues"
are not up to this - they remind me those notorious
professors (MAJORITY at the time !) who refused to look
through the Galieleo's telescope, because they "already knew"
that all what he saw was just a hallucination.
On Mon, 5 Jun 1995, Stan Mulaik wrote:
> Prof. Berezin:
> I appreciate your efforts to look into this field and its literature.
> As a passer-through of the bionet, I simply noticed your posting and
> wished there had been provided more details. I saw in a later positing
> that you had sketched out more of the details of the bicameral approach.
> Thank you for the information.
> Stan Mulaik
More information about the Bioforum