Why are anaerobic organisms simple and aerobic organisms complex?

Jonathan Ewbank ewbank at monod.biol.mcgill.ca
Mon Nov 27 13:43:56 EST 1995


in answer to the question in the subject line,

mkolotila at NECCADM1.NECC.MASS.EDU (Michael Kolotila x3887) wrote:

>Hi Joy;
>It is a matter of being multicellular.  Aerobic bacteria have a level of 
>complexity on par with anaerobic bacteria.  However, when you are 
>multicellular gas exchange through diffusion becomes a problem.  
>Diffusion is effective over short distances.  Open a bottle of perfume in 
>a room and see how it takes to reach the other side.  So with 
>multicellular organisms it becomes neccessary to specialize cells into 
>structures that will transport oxygen to all of the cells.  Then you can 
>expand the problem to nutrients and waste removals.  The upshot is that 
>you engineer a complex organism.
>Hope that this helps.

perhaps i am failing to understand your answer correctly, but it doesn't 
seem to address the question asked. it's a reasonable explanation for why 
aerobic multicellular organsims need specialized structures, but if an 
organism is anaerobic, by definition it would not be limited by diffusion 
of oxygen. i suspect the answer is that complexity requires energy, and 
the amount of energy available through aerobic respiration significantly 
exceeds that available through anaerobic metabolism.

j.


ewbank at monod.biol.mcgill.ca



More information about the Bioforum mailing list