The Motives of Scientists
berezin at MCMAIL.CIS.MCMASTER.CA
Sun Oct 1 22:03:55 EST 1995
On Sun, 1 Oct 1995 meron at cars3.uchicago.edu wrote:
> >The question does not apply because, by and large, universities (at least
> >in the US) are not funded by government largesse and are instead funded by
> >the decentralized decisions of prospective students and their families.
> >They appear to decide, in large and very well informed numbers, to
> >matriculate to universities such as Princeton whose faculties choose to
> >study irrelevancies such as Fermat's last theorem. Hence ostensibly
> >useless pursuits indeed have market value.
Very nice exposition why we (e.g. irrelevant theoreticians,
like myself) do indeed may have a market value. Agree fully.
Thanks for the truly lucid argument. (I mean it !).
> As P. J. O'Rourke already wrote in the "Parlament of Whores" one of
> the great moving forces of politics is human belief that through the
> legislative process one can get something without having to pay for it.
> Since (as you, being a student in finance for sure know) there is no
> such thing as a free lunch, this belief is false, but this fact won't
> stop people from acting on it.
Here I am sorry to disagree. There IS such thing as a free lunch
and even often on a mass scale.
Ask any freeloader for the instructions.
> Mati Meron
> "When you argue with a fool,
> chances are he is doing just the same"
Yes. But risk is often worth taking. And beside, do your
really care care if somebody may think you are a fool ?
("He, the one, whose goal is the opinion of others [ about
him ], is weak" - Leo Tolstoy).
More information about the Bioforum