Rejected bionet. postings: double standards
Don Chen
chend at ucs.orst.edu
Sat Oct 14 13:01:19 EST 1995
kristoff at net.bio.net (David Kristofferson) wrote:
>stuff deleted
>No journal allows ads in the middle of their articles. Advertising is
>always done in a separate section, and the advertising is used to
>support the journal. This is one of the few media that, because of
>its open nature, some think that they can utilize without contributing
>much to its support. We have a mechanism of advertising through the
>BIOSCI WWW home page. We do not allow broadcast ads - period - they
>annoy our readers and consume resources in our mail queue and archive
>site. If someone is trying to use the system for commercial
>advantage, let them help support it. The government is not going to
>do so much longer, and we already have had *good* commercial citizens
>such as Molecular Dynamics and Knight-Ridder Information who *are*
>helping. We would have a real double standard if we permit some to
>get for free what the organizations that are sponsoring us are paying
>for!
In reference to the idea of separate sections for advertising:
Would it be useful to have a separate newsgroup for commercial
advertising? This does not address the problem of costs or payments
to the bionet sponsoring organizations.
Don
*************************************************************
Sleeping we image what awake we wish,
Dogs dream of bones, fishermen of fish. -Theocritus
*************************************************************
More information about the Bioforum
mailing list