Rejected bionet. postings: double standards
una at doliolum.biology.yale.edu
Sat Oct 14 14:56:49 EST 1995
mgk at darwin.clas.Virginia.EDU (Mahlon G. Kelly) wrote:
> I posted an announcement for ... microscopes ...
Mahlon Kelly refers to an episode in sci.bio.misc, where he posted
(several times!) a long ad for a product of only marginal relevance
to sci.bio.misc. I asked him to stop, and I directed him to a more
appropriate newsgroup: sci.techniques.microscopy.
> Una complained about it, but she was the only one ...
>It is difficult in the science area to distinguish between a
>commercial post that is providing a service and one which is
>just trying to make money.
No matter what the content, repeated posts are NOT appropriate.
>... often it is very helpful to scientists to know of sources of
So build yourself a Web Page, and put the URL in your .sig, just
like everyone else.
>I feel very strongly that there should be some leeway given to
>the definition of a commercial post.
Oh really? You would include your own ads in the "legitimate"
category, while excluding others?
>I almost posted a message similar to the one above, but decided
>to let it be, in the interest of peace and harmony.
For the record, this is false. Mahlon Kelly posted a complaint
*and* sent me e-mail in which he tried to justify his actions ad
More information about the Bioforum