TRUTH about US R&D SPENDING from BRITISH NATURE
edstrom at slugo.hmsc.orst.edu
Fri Apr 19 13:09:49 EST 1996
In article <4l65fd$23m8 at b.stat.purdue.edu>,
hrubin at b.stat.purdue.edu (Herman Rubin) writes:
>In article <4l3cf6$t3d at gazette.bcm.tmc.edu>,
>Jim Smolen <jsmolen at bcm.tmc.edu> wrote:
>>Bert Gold <bgold at itsa.ucsf.edu> wrote:
>>>from Nature, 28 March 1996, page 271:
>>>...If the United States moves to balance its budget without tackling
>>>the areas where it actually spends three-quarters of the money
>>>-- defence and manditory health and social security programmes
>>>-- then science spending will be crushed, along with much else of
>>>value that the federal government does.
>>Nice to see some straight talking on the subject.
>We need to get the government to ease out of both funding and control
>of research, and to encourage private funding by both for-profit and
>non-profit voluntary organizations.
Yes, by all means! We need more of the high-quality research that altruistic
and efficient private enterprises provide. Let the fine, objective and
painstaking work done by the tobacco industry on the pharmacology of nicotine
addiction and tobacco-related health risks, along with the candor and openness
with which they selflessly shared the fruits of their labor, stand as a
shining example of what we can expect from such a glorious future.
>The government should never have gotten into it in the first place.
>Herman Rubin, Dept. of Statistics, Purdue Univ., West Lafayette IN47907-1399
>hrubin at stat.purdue.edu Phone: (317)494-6054 FAX: (317)494-0558
John Edstrom | edstrom @ slugo.hmsc.orst.edu
"Lurker" at BioMOO (bioinfo.weizmann.ac.il:8888)
Hatfield Marine Science Center
2030 S. Marine Science Drive
Newport, Oregon 97365-5296
wk: (541) 867 0197
fx: (541) 867 0138
More information about the Bioforum