predisposed -v- learnt
Alan Peyton-Smith
100351.3267 at compuserve.com
Sat Dec 7 02:31:58 EST 1996
thomasr at topaz.cqu.edu.au (Roger Thomas) wrote:
>In article <3NEpycBTKMTS089yn at ibm.net>, parker0 at ibm.net (Paul Parker) writes:
>> In article <1996Nov24.085249 at topaz>,
>> thomasr at topaz.cqu.edu.au (Roger Thomas) wrote:
>>>In article <m+4lycBTKQyN089yn at ibm.net>, parker0 at ibm.net (Paul Parker) writes:
>>
>> ---deletions---
>>
>> The earlier deletions referred to reports on studies in the USA linking
>> aggresive behaviour with serotonin levels, establishing this was both
>> inheritable characteristic and treatable.
>> Other inheritable and treatable genetic links exist.
>
>>>> How much of an individuals behaviour is an inherited genetic
>>>> predisposition at birth, how much is from culture - what is learnt
>>>> after birth ?
>>>> Links between culturally modified predispostions are being found.
>
>> We can leave this issue - we can all learn bad habits, more as this
>> is not relevant directly to the issues raised below.
>Except I'd comment that in a family where all members are raised
>under the same circumstances there are often *marked* differences
>in behaviour/disposition.
>>>> If we are proving the existance of such inherited predispositions
>>>> we are saying those same theories which the Nazi's were - and
>>>> remain, so widely condemned for were perhaps accurate...
>>>> If you're unhappy with this path of thinking, with where it leads,
>>>> don't feel lonely !
>>>Facts don't have to be palatable :-)
>>>
>>>Assuming the hypothesis is established the next step is to do something
>>>about correcting serotonin levels in individuals who are suffering.
>
>> Sorry as not clear enough. My concern was not serotonin levels
>> influencing a persons behaviour or predisposition to particular - for
>> example aggressive, behaviour.
>>
>> Was reflecting on the debate re race, the usual derogatory comments
>> over certain behaviours being normal - or at the time being abnormal,
>> for people of a particular race.
>Realised that. 'Dour Scot' etc (why wouldn't you be dour if you
>had to live in that climate! :-)
>> In our discussions on racial issues we have dodged questions :
>>
>> 1) whether exists genetic identifiers for race;
>Probably.
A la Murray and Herrnstein?(sp?)
>> 2) whether such gentic identifier - if exist, might be
>> linked to any behavioural characteristic;
>Possibly.
Oprah Winfrey stated publicly that African Americans, as a racial
group, are very much pre-disposed towards using violence.
>
>> 3) whether any genetic identifier should be linked to
>> rights of individuals;
>NO way.
Why not? If it can be shown that a certain racial group is less
endowed intellectually, then why not give them special advantages,
such as the various "race norming" policies in the good old USA?
<Zipping up my flame-retardant suit..>
<snip>
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
"This year will go down in history. For the first time a Civilised
nation has full gun registration!! Our streets will be safer, our
police more efficient, and the world will follow our lead into the
future!"
Adolf Hitler (1889 -1945)
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
More information about the Bioforum
mailing list