Of Strange Flesh - re 666 & chemistry (fwd)

[Alexander Berezin]

On Tue, 31 Dec 1996, Kerry Delf wrote:

> 
> PLEASE CC REPLIES TO <kld at jersey.uoregon.edu>
> ---------------------------------------------
> 
> 
> I know that the post below is simply the esoteric jibberish of a
> kook-ranter;  unfortunately, there are those who take it seriously.
> 
> I am no microbiologist, and therefore do not have the information at my
> fingertips with which to debunk this bizarre theory -- I'm hoping someone
> with more knowledge of the subject can provide me <kld at jersey.uoregon.edu>
> with a brief, educated explanation as to why human biology just doesn't
> work this way.  :)
> 
> The basic claim made here by Adam Willson (based on the theories of a
> well-known [in certain circles] kook, Tani Jantsang) is that there are two
> separate species we label "human":  one is based on Carbon-12 (6 protons,
> 6 neutrons), while the other is based on some other Carbon isotope.
> 
> Anyone care to take a stab at this one? 

kooky or not, but there is some serious
literature on biological differences of
isotopes, e.g. DNA based of carbon-12,
and on carbon-13 enriched species. 
This area is under-studied.
Alex Berezin


> 
> Thanks in advance,
> 
> -K.Delf
> 
> 
> -----------=Kerry Delf=-------------=<kld at jersey.uoregon.edu>=-----------
> -------------------------------------------------------------------------
> "I fear sometimes that I have the ambition of a genius, the eye and ear 
> of a genius, and the talent of a chimneysweep.  I go down into the filthy 
> world, I come up black, I scatter the ashes and cinders of my research 
> onto white papers, but what have I got?  Paper with black marks all over 
> it."    --Orson Scott Card's fictional Honore de Balzac
> -------------------------------------------------------------------------
> EMAILING RESPONSES TO MY USENET POSTS CONSTITUTES PERMISSION TO POST THEM
> -------------------------------------------------------------------------
> 
> 
> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
> Date: Mon, 30 Dec 1996 16:09:43 -0500
> From: "Adam D. Willson" <gs08adw at panther.Gsu.EDU>
> Subject: Of Strange Flesh - re 666 & chemistry
> 
> 
> This is the best explanation I can give at this time w/o getting _too_
> esoteric.
> 
> 666 is the number of man, which is the number of the beast. E.g., of
> natural animals, those rooted in nature, following nature etc. It
> esoterically represents: SIX protons, SIX electrons, & SIX neutrons.
> 
> Scratch asked me what the "strange flesh" would be like? The best answer I
> can give is this:
> 
> Protons determine electrons, which in turn determines matter which
> klippoths surely are. They are matter.
> 
> Now the # of neutrons could be diff. which would mean they would look like
> any other human, but would only be diff. in terms of behavior.
> 
> Now if the neutrons are set free of the demiurgos which encases them they
> become Ophioneus (cf. Tani's article "Akarthic & Ophionic States", Karl
> recently posted this).
> 
> In Genesis 1:2 the 6 constructor sephiroth move over the BAHU which is
> called "the waters". 666 is the Foundation/Root which is called BAHU.
> 
> Demiurge is the nucleus of our atoms represented by 6 colors (quarks). The
> hochmah/vajre/logos must be rooted in the waters, in order to have a
> Foundation.
> 
> Again if the neutrons are set free of the demiurge which encases them they
> become ophionic. All of this is very difficult to get into w/o a
> familiarity of the Kaballa, or Jantsang's articles.
> 
> I recommend for those who are interested _Serpent Race vs. Adamic Race_
> pg. 20. <snip>  Or if you want you may read the collection of articles by
> Tani on Hr. Vad's website at:
> 
> http://www.inet.uni-c.dk/~haroth/Abyss/Vad/index.html
> 
> Best regards,
> Adam D. Willson
> gs08adw at panther.gsu.edu
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
>