Of Strange Flesh - re 666 & chemistry (fwd)

[Alexander Berezin]

On Tue, 31 Dec 1996, Anonymous wrote:

> Kerry Delf wrote:
> > 
> > PLEASE CC REPLIES TO <kld at jersey.uoregon.edu>
> > ---------------------------------------------
> > 
> > I know that the post below is simply the esoteric jibberish of a
> > kook-ranter;  unfortunately, there are those who take it seriously.
> > 
> > I am no microbiologist, and therefore do not have the information at my
> > fingertips with which to debunk this bizarre theory -- I'm hoping someone
> > with more knowledge of the subject can provide me <kld at jersey.uoregon.edu>
> > with a brief, educated explanation as to why human biology just doesn't
> > work this way.  :)
> > 
> > The basic claim made here by Adam Willson (based on the theories of a
> > well-known [in certain circles] kook, Tani Jantsang) is that there are two
> > separate species we label "human":  one is based on Carbon-12 (6 protons,
> > 6 neutrons), while the other is based on some other Carbon isotope.
> > 
> > Anyone care to take a stab at this one?
> > 
> > Thanks in advance,
> > 
> > -K.Delf
> > 
> > -----------=Kerry Delf=-------------=<kld at jersey.uoregon.edu>=-----------
> > -------------------------------------------------------------------------
> > "I fear sometimes that I have the ambition of a genius, the eye and ear
> > of a genius, and the talent of a chimneysweep.  I go down into the filthy
> > world, I come up black, I scatter the ashes and cinders of my research
> > onto white papers, but what have I got?  Paper with black marks all over
> > it."    --Orson Scott Card's fictional Honore de Balzac
> > -------------------------------------------------------------------------
> > EMAILING RESPONSES TO MY USENET POSTS CONSTITUTES PERMISSION TO POST THEM
> > -------------------------------------------------------------------------
> > 
> > ---------- Forwarded message ----------
> > Date: Mon, 30 Dec 1996 16:09:43 -0500
> > From: "Adam D. Willson" <gs08adw at panther.Gsu.EDU>
> > Newsgroups: alt.satanism
> > Subject: Of Strange Flesh - re 666 & chemistry
> > 
> > This is the best explanation I can give at this time w/o getting _too_
> > esoteric.
> > 
> > 666 is the number of man, which is the number of the beast. E.g., of
> > natural animals, those rooted in nature, following nature etc. It
> > esoterically represents: SIX protons, SIX electrons, & SIX neutrons.
> > 
> > Scratch asked me what the "strange flesh" would be like? The best answer I
> > can give is this:
> > 
> > Protons determine electrons, which in turn determines matter which
> > klippoths surely are. They are matter.
> > 
> > Now the # of neutrons could be diff. which would mean they would look like
> > any other human, but would only be diff. in terms of behavior.
> > 
> > Now if the neutrons are set free of the demiurgos which encases them they
> > become Ophioneus (cf. Tani's article "Akarthic & Ophionic States", Karl
> > recently posted this).
> > 
> > In Genesis 1:2 the 6 constructor sephiroth move over the BAHU which is
> > called "the waters". 666 is the Foundation/Root which is called BAHU.
> > 
> > Demiurge is the nucleus of our atoms represented by 6 colors (quarks). The
> > hochmah/vajre/logos must be rooted in the waters, in order to have a
> > Foundation.
> > 
> > Again if the neutrons are set free of the demiurge which encases them they
> > become ophionic. All of this is very difficult to get into w/o a
> > familiarity of the Kaballa, or Jantsang's articles.
> > 
> > I recommend for those who are interested _Serpent Race vs. Adamic Race_
> > pg. 20. <snip>  Or if you want you may read the collection of articles by
> > Tani on Hr. Vad's website at:
> > 
> > http://www.inet.uni-c.dk/~haroth/Abyss/Vad/index.html
> > 
> > Best regards,
> > Adam D. Willson
> > gs08adw at panther.gsu.edu
> 
> 
> It is somewhat cool that you posted this statement on the last day of
> 1996.  As you may or may not already know, the year 1996 is only like 8
> other years in this milleneum in that it contains the number 666 within
> it.  If you drop the '1' and invert the two '9's, you get the famed
> dreaded mark.  I have heard that when biological organizms consume large
> amounts of food or water laced with deuturium that throughout time the
> organism might have a slight slowdown in metabolism.  This may
> supposedly be due to the increased weight of compounds due to the
> doubling in molecular weight of the deuturium over the hydrogen.  Carbon
> 13, however, does not have the extreme amount of added mass to the
> compound over that of hydrogen.  Probably there would not be the change
> in metabolic effects that would be observed from consuming large amounts
> of heavy water.  You never know, however.  If you want to, you might
> consider becoming such a mutant being.  By consuming large amounts of
> C13 seaweed throughout time, you might provide an interesting metabolic
> experiment.  You would have to do so throughout several years, and
> probably nothing would end up happening.  Afterwards, however, you might
> periodically throughout time dedicate your tissues for CMR analysis,
> because they would show up well on such scans.  It would also be helpful
> in guessing throughout time how quickly certain tissues are replaced
> with new material taken in as food.  

> Eating C13 laced food might be
> expensive, however, and in the end, you probably wouldn't feel any
> different.  It's an interesting thought...

Experiments with isotopically replaced mice (carbon-12 to carbon-13
replacements; Gregg et al. 1973) showed a loss of reproductive capacity. 
Perhaps to get your carbon-12 replaced by carbon-13 (may NOT be very 
expensive at mass production) will be a good way of birth control.
Isotopes, yes, are a bit expensive, but you save on condoms. May not
be a that bad deal.

> -X
> 
>