Richard Dawkins and hypocrisy
Susan Jane Hogarth
sjhogart at unity.ncsu.edu
Mon Jan 13 20:33:13 EST 1997
dh201 at cam.ac.uk wrote:
> >On 16 Dec 1996 16:56:20 GMT, cam.ac.uk at news.cam.ac.uk (A. Caian)
> >Evolution is fact, not theory. Creationism is belief, not fact.
Then dh201 at cam.ac.uk wrote:
> I always thought that both of them are theories.
Right on. Change in species over observable time is a *fact*.
Evolution by natural selection is one explanation of this fact.
Manipulation of species by a creator is another explanation.
Some people believe *both* that there is a creator, *and* that the
creator has allowed evolution by natural selection to proceed. There's
actually room for a lot of overlap between these two ideas - they are by
*no* means mutually exclusive.
Personally, I can understand the evidence for natural selection better
than the evidence for the Christian god - he seems rather arbitrary and
unfathomable... but then, a god *would*, wouldn't he? ;-)
Suszuki GS page: http://homepage.cistron.nl/~peterh/gsresources/
More information about the Bioforum