Kill the SPAMs!

Richard H. Miller rick at
Fri Sep 19 18:15:53 EST 1997

taguebw at wrote:

: In article <5vlk2l$i6f$1 at oravannahka.Helsinki.FI>, Dag Stenberg
: <stenberg at> wrote:

: > Seeing that some days the complete content of bionet.general consists of
: > spam, whereas other newsgroups I frequent all have less than 50% spam
: > content, it came to me: does the word "general" attract especially many
: > spammers? What would be better: change of name or moderated group?
: > 
: > Dag STenberg

: This may be true: there are a number of city specific ng's that use
: "general"; i.e., the baltimore newgroup is ba.general. The name may be
: part of the problem with spam in this group.

The name probably is but the location (early in the alphabit is more). I
also wonder if any of the spam killers are scanning bionet for spam. Someone
might drop a line (with one of the spams) to and
suggest that the spam killers include this hierarchy in their activities.
They currently do handle most of the local hierarchies


More information about the Bioforum mailing list