A Common Misconception among Evolutionists Re: Creation Science
rot13.qxerfpu at rkrpcp.pbz.getridof.com
Sat Oct 10 19:00:33 EST 1998
On Fri, 09 Oct 1998 19:06:48 -0700, in alt.atheism, Ray Lanthier
<rlanthier at earthlink.net> etched in the space-time continuum
>Don Kresch wrote:
>> On Thu, 08 Oct 1998 18:44:45 -0700, in alt.atheism, Ray Lanthier
>> <rlanthier at earthlink.net> etched in the space-time continuum
>> Oh Ray--what ng are you posting from? There's a shitload of bgs in the
>> header, and it would be nice to get rid of those who really don't need this. I
>> and many others are in alt.atheism.
>posting FROM? I am postint TO only one ng at a time.
Those are the newsgroups this is going to. Learn to use Communicator's
newsreader. (How did I know it? I have the world's best newsreader: Forte
Agent. I can see all the header stuff if I want.)
>> >Jessica M. Wolfman wrote:
>> >> >
>> >> >Hence, faith in the senses. Faith in reason. Faith in the order of the universe.Faith is evidence of
>> >> >a higher order than physical perception.
>> >> Uh, not, not faith. Unless you have reason to believe that your senses
>> >> are failing you, the correct word is "confedence", and that's not
>> >> faith.
>> >Faith is not much different from confidence.
>> It's far different, actually. Confidence requires some evidence. Faith
>> decries evidence.
Faith: belief without evidence or in spite of overwhelming evidence to the
You were saying?
>> > It is proceeds from a source that is extra-sensory and arational.
>> Then we can never have faith, since it is extra-sensory, and we should not
>> give it credence, since it is irrational.
>> You've just destroyed your own argument.
>arational not irrational.
My pardon. Still, if it is without rationality, it is IRrational.
alt.atheism atheist #51, Knight of BAAWA, DNRC o-
Atheist Minister for St. Dogbert.
Go away--the message is over
More information about the Bioforum