Medicine's Ten Greatest Discoveries
Steven B. Harris
sbharris at ix.netcom.com
Sun Sep 6 19:32:14 EST 1998
In <6sv3bp$ekn$1 at nina.pagesz.net> henryj at nina.pagesz.net (George
>In article <6suu6i$513 at sjx-ixn2.ix.netcom.com>,
>Steven B. Harris <sbharris at ix.netcom.com> wrote:
>>In <6stu7f$mpu$1 at nina.pagesz.net> henryj at nina.pagesz.net (George
>>> Any old excuse to justify the medical establishment's
>>>fear of real facts. When we have vastly different medical
>>>practice in the USA, such as radical prostate operations
>>>common in some areas and not in others, but have similar
>>>RESULTS, then badly-trained MDs (trained, NOT educated)
>>>mouth that this means nothing becasue to admit it would
>>>interfere with the cash flow.
>> Alas, your example only proves my point. A *lack* of
>>correlation between two things (rate of radical prostate opperations
>>and cancer outcome) is a far stronger result from epidemiological
>>statistics than correlations are.
> Classic doubletalk.
Sorry if you're not with it enough to understand it. No point in
continuing this discussion.
More information about the Bioforum