BIOLOGICAL ALCHEMY !
susanhill at esc.net.au
Sun Nov 14 17:56:59 EST 1999
I have read both of your recommended texts and they are both purile from a
scientific standpoint. Kervran talks about 'transmutation' from deficient
plots but no-where in his book does he give an analysis of the plant to
establish that it produced one element by transmuting from another. That is
assumed BECAUSE HE STARTED with a rate limiting nutrient deficiency.
Whatever happened to the scientific method ?
Go ahead - spend the money - buy the books - and if you have half a brain
you will come to the same conclusion that I did when I read about the ex
Qantas pilot who believed that all the antennas on peoples houses were part
of a secret alien spacehip navigation system. Duh - why don't you knock on
their door and ask them if they are part of the conspiracy !@!
The 'secret' life of plants is equally technically challenging.
david_loewenstern at yr.com wrote in message <80f9km$cca$1 at nnrp1.deja.com>...
>In article <80com9$h35$1 at nnrp1.deja.com>,
> rmcelwaine at visto.com wrote:
>> (5) Weigh the residue from each group. [The residue of
>> the sprouted group will usually weigh at least
>> SEVERAL PERCENT MORE than the other group.]
>No duh. What exactly do you think sprouting is? I'll bet if you take
>an acorn, plant it and wait a decade, then come back and incinerate the
>resulting "sprout", the residue will weigh more than a _whole_ acorn.
>> (6) Analyze quantitatively the residue of each group
>> mineral content. [ Some of the mineral atoms of
>> sprouted group have been TRANSMUTED into heavier
>> mineral elements by FUSING with atoms of oxygen,
>> hydrogen, carbon, nitrogen, etc..]
>This would be more impressive if you burned the filter paper as well.
>Otherwise, you can't rule out the much more plausible hypothesis that
>the sprouts have extracted trace minerals from the paper.
>> Some MINERAL DEPOSITS in the ground are formed by
>> organisms FUSING together atoms of silicon, carbon,
>> oxygen, hydrogen, etc..
>Even if we assume such transmutations occur, how could you _possibly_
>know the above?
>> The two reactions Si + C <--> Ca, by micro-organisms,
>> cause "STONE SICKNESS" in statues, building bricks, etc..
>Never heard of it, but feel free to post a description of the
>phenomenon, and evidence that the silicon is transmuting. You sure
>you're not describing damage due to acid rain?
>> The reaction N2 --> CO, catalysed by very hot iron,
>> creates a CARBON MONOXIDE POISON HAZARD for welder operators
>> and people near woodstoves (even properly sealed ones).
>And not, say, incomplete burning of the fuel? That's the usual cause of
>CO. Do your results still hold if you heat up the iron electrically in
>a pure nitrogen environment?
>> Some bacteria can even NEUTRALIZE RADIOACTIVITY !
>You mean, they can survive in radioactive environments? Sure. So can a
>guy in a lead suit. They can prevent radioactive decay? Prove it.
>> ALL OF THESE THINGS AND MORE HAPPEN, IN SPITE OF the
>> currently accepted "laws" of physics, (including the law
>> which says that atomic fusion requires EXTREMELY HIGH
>> temperatures and pressures.)
>There's no such physical law. It's hard to take seriously anyone who
>tries to blow away all of modern science without understanding what a
>scientific law _is_.
>Sent via Deja.com http://www.deja.com/
>Before you buy.
More information about the Bioforum