IUBio

The stance of the S=Km assumption

Athel athel at IR1CBM.CNRS-MRS.FR
Mon Aug 5 03:45:45 EST 1996


It is almost 20 years since I thought seriously about this, so it is 
quite possible that more recent information than I have is available, 
but maybe not, so it may still be worthwhile giving some references to 
some papers from the 1970s, as well as one earlier one:

D. E. Atkinson (1969) Current Topics Cell. Reg. 1, 29-43

A. R. Fersht (1974) Proc. Roy. Soc. ser. B 187, 397-407

A. Cornish-Bowden (1976) J. Mol. Biol. 101, 1-9

In the last of these three I tried to review such evidence as existed 
about the actual concentrations of substrates in vivo, and came to the 
conclusion that for the glycolytic enzymes (apart from aldolase) they 
were indeed reasonably close to Michaelis constant values, but for 
other classes of enzymes such as the catabolic enzymes primarily 
considered by Fersht they were more likely to be much higher. The 
reference to Lowry & Passonneau (1964) J. Biol. Chem. 239, 31-42 in my 
paper suggests that they were just concerned with aldolase, but my 
recollection (I have looked at the paper for a long time) is that they 
considered all the enzymes of glycolysis, not just aldolase.

I did a somewhat more detailed study afterwards in reply to a paper 
that Fersht wrote in response to mine, but as his reply was never 
published (as far as I know), my reply to it was never submitted for 
publication. I probably have the MS somewhere, but I fear it is 
unlikely that I can find it.

It is probably worth adding that all of these papers (as well as 
Cleland's of 1967 that you refer to) were written independently of any 
knowledge of metabolic control analysis, and contains points that now 
seem rather naive.

Athel Cornish-Bowden
athel at ibsm.cnrs-mrs.fr




More information about the Btk-mca mailing list

Send comments to us at biosci-help [At] net.bio.net