> Let us
> try to determine the substitute for k+ for the catalyzed process: if it is
> k+_catalyzed, we can reformulate the second law in kinetic terms:
>> (k+_catalyzed)/(k+) = (k8)(E)/(k-) /6/
>> I am not sure that /6/ is unproblematic.
We'll be in a better position to answer that, as soon as you (1) define
k+_catalyzed, and (2) explain why is there no k-_catalyzed in your
formalism.
--Petr
_____________________________________________________________
Petr Kuzmic Ph.D. * BioKin Ltd. * Madison, WI 53708-8336, USA
pkuzmic at biokin.com * http://www.biokin.com * 608.256.1269 fax
