Pentcho Valev wrote
>The examples are many more, but I still don't believe that there will be
>any interest. The group neglected an obvious theoretical evidence that
>catalysts can shift the equilibrium, and experimental verification is
>difficult, if at all possible. What does this mean?
>>Best regards,
>Pentcho
If the "experimental verification is difficult, if at all possible"
than it means nothing. "Obvious theoretical evidence" will be neglected
unless it leads to experiments. I don't believe in the second law, just as
I don't believe in the law of gravity or the theory of evolution. Each
explains all observations to date, but they will be
discarded/reformulated/modified whenever new data necessitate. Theory only
doesn't make me doubt. Therefore indeed no interest.
This is my last contribution on the subject
Best regards,
Benno ter Kuile
