X-linked "any" of Peter Hunt (CSIRO)
fodoran at LUDENS.ELTE.HU
fodoran at LUDENS.ELTE.HU
Sat Mar 25 12:57:13 EST 1995
From: MX%"Postmaster at ludens.elte.hu" 25-MAR-1995 18:40:21.45
To: MX%"fodoran at ludens.elte.hu"
Subj: SMTP delivery error
Date: Sat, 25 Mar 1995 18:40:16 +0100
From: SMTP delivery agent <Postmaster at ludens.elte.hu>
To: <fodoran at ludens.elte.hu>
Subject: SMTP delivery error
X-Report-Type: Nondelivery; boundary="> Error description:"
Note: this message was generated automatically.
An error was detected while processing the enclosed message. A list of
the affected recipients follows. This list is in a special format that
allows software like LISTSERV to automatically take action on incorrect
addresses; you can safely ignore the numeric codes.
--> Error description:
Error-For: phunt at chiswick.oprud.csiro.au
Error-Text: %MX-F-NOHOST, no such host
-Retry count exceeded
Error-End: 1 error detected
------------------------------ Rejected message ------------------------------
Received: by ludens.elte.hu (MX V4.1 VAX) id 14; Sat, 25 Mar 1995 16:38:17 +0100
Sender: fodoran at ludens.elte.hu
Date: Sat, 25 Mar 1995 16:38:16 +0100
From: fodoran at ludens.elte.hu
To: phunt at chiswick.oprud.csiro.au
Message-ID: <0098DE57.4B0109E0.14 at ludens.elte.hu>
Subject: let me know if received please
From: MX%"phunt at chiswick.anprod.CSIRO.AU" 22-MAR-1995 15:08:47.16
To: MX%"bionet-news at dl.ac.uk"
Subj: strange patterns of inheritance
Return-Path: <server-daemon at dl.ac.uk>
Received: from mserv1.dl.ac.uk by ludens.elte.hu (MX V4.1 VAX) with SMTP; Wed,
22 Mar 1995 14:01:48 +0100
Received: by mserv1.dl.ac.uk id MAA08719 (8.6.10/5.3[ref postmaster at dl.ac.uk]
for dl.ac.uk from server-daemon at dl.ac.uk); Wed, 22 Mar 1995 12:26:58
Resent-From: <server-daemon at dl.ac.uk>
Received: by mserv1.dl.ac.uk id MAA08275 (8.6.10/5.3[ref postmaster at dl.ac.uk]
for dl.ac.uk from server-daemon at dl.ac.uk); Wed, 22 Mar 1995 12:23:11
Received: by mserv1.dl.ac.uk id MAA07791 (8.6.10/5.3[ref postmaster at dl.ac.uk]
for dl.ac.uk from news at dl.ac.uk); Wed, 22 Mar 1995 12:13:21 GMT
Date: 21 Mar 1995 18:23:53 -0800
Resent-Date: Wed, 22 Mar 95 12:26:51 UT
Message-ID: <95322122651.~INN-DWDa00165.bionet-news at dl.ac.uk>
Resent-Message-ID: <199503220222.AA04236 at ram.chiswick.anprod.csiro.au>
From: phunt at chiswick.anprod.CSIRO.AU (Peter Hunt)
Reply-To: phunt at chiswick.anprod.CSIRO.AU (Peter Hunt)
Sender: "bionet.celegans mail newsgroup" <server-daemon at dl.ac.uk>
To: "bionet.celegans mail newsgroup" <bionet-news at dl.ac.uk>
Subject: strange patterns of inheritance
Comments: List problems/queries to <biosci at dl.ac.uk>
Comments: To mail both the group and netnews send to (celegans at dl.ac.uk)
X-Article-Number: bionet.celegans Msg # 306
X-Mailer: MXT V 12.16.1
Dear Worm Breeders,
Please consider this hypothetical situation:
Homozygotes for a mutation at X-linked locus (call it any) have a
particular phenotype which is 100% penetrant in all selfed progeny. BUT if
you take hemizygous males and cross them with homozygous hermaphrodites
then the phenotype of the resultant progeny is not 100% penetrant.
So 100% of any/any animals which are self progeny have the mutant phenotype
BUT <100% (say 80%) any/any animals which are the progeny of a cross
between any/o males and any/any hermaphrodites have the mutant phenotype.
What do you check to make sure that this result is real? (apart from
checking that your parental strains are what you think they are).
If it is real, then what are the possible explanations?
Has anyone actually seen this (or something similar occur)?
Any comments would be appreciated.
^^ Peter Hunt
## UNE Dept. Biochemistry/ CSIRO Div. Animal Health
More information about the Celegans