> James me?
I was referring (as was Andrew) to this:
> > If aging was a throat infection anti-oxidants, caloric restriction,
> > and beneficial nutrients would be a throat losenge. But telomeric
> > therapy to elongate the telomeres would be an anti-biotic.
>> Uh... yeah, right. An antibiotic that you can't deliver where it needs
> to go, and that causes cancer, and that isn't effective on many of the
> strains that could be causing your sore throat anyway.
James also wrote:
> I'm not even sure that the "making the best of a bad lot" argument holds
> water, for two reasons: One, things in the wild don't really do CR, they
> just starve. Two, while mice have a short enough lifespan to have this be
> plausible, longer-lived mammals do not. Unless it is just random
> evolutionary conservation there is no reason that this phenomenon should
> apply to animals with multi-decade lifespans, as any period of starvation
> would be inconsequential to the overall length of their reproductive
I don't think this follows. The "making the best of a bad lot" argument
applies mainly to mild food shortages over long periods, not to really
severe shortages over short periods. The long periods can be arbitrarily
long -- a decade seems quite likely enough to be evolutionarily relevant.
Aubrey de Grey