Dear email recipient,
Due to a configuration problem at my site yesterday, some mail
destined for you bounced. The problem has since been fixed.
I am hereby forwarding the bounced message to you, see below.
-- paul
root at cse.nau.edu
>From MAILER-DAEMON Tue Jun 21 13:58:54 1994
Return-Path: MAILER-DAEMON
Received: from localhost (localhost) by sunset.cse.nau.edu (8.6.9/2.2-nau) with internal id NAA16184; Tue, 21 Jun 1994 13:58:53 -0700
Date: Tue, 21 Jun 1994 13:58:53 -0700
From: Mail Delivery Subsystem <MAILER-DAEMON>
Subject: Returned mail: Local configuration error
Message-Id: <199406212058.NAA16184 at sunset.cse.nau.edu>
To: <BIOSCI-REQUEST at net.bio.net>
To: postmaster
Status: O
The original message was received at Tue, 21 Jun 1994 13:58:51 -0700
from net.bio.net [134.172.2.69]
----- The following addresses had delivery problems -----
<swift at nauvax.ucc.nau.edu> (unrecoverable error)
----- Transcript of session follows -----
553 sunset.cse.nau.edu config error: mail loops back to myself
554 <swift at nauvax.ucc.nau.edu>... Local configuration error
----- Original message follows -----
Return-Path: BIOSCI-REQUEST at net.bio.net
Received: from net.bio.net (net.bio.net [134.172.2.69]) by sunset.cse.nau.edu (8.6.9/2.2-nau) with ESMTP id NAA16182 for <swift at nauvax.ucc.nau.edu>; Tue, 21 Jun 1994 13:58:51 -0700
Received: (from daemon at localhost) by net.bio.net (8.6.9/8.6.6) id NAA18121 for chlam-list; Tue, 21 Jun 1994 13:26:36 -0700
Received: (from news at localhost) by net.bio.net (8.6.9/8.6.6) id NAA18116 for chlam-arpanet; Tue, 21 Jun 1994 13:26:34 -0700
To: chlamydomonas at net.bio.net
From: CLFBC at cunyvm.cuny.edu (Charlene Forest)
Subject: Chlamy nomenclature
Date: 21 Jun 1994 13:26:26 -0700
Sender: daemon at net.bio.net
Message-ID: <199406212026.NAA18104 at net.bio.net>
NNTP-Posting-Host: net.bio.net
Has any decision been made (and who will make the decision) about gene
names in "Chlamy"? I had the feeling that opinions tended to favor
keeping the 3 letter, lower case designations for genes. What about the
dash? Will we hear anything more on the net? Personally I would hate to
see changes without a strong justification. Thanks. Charlene
