In article <d4981f49.0305190546.1103714b at posting.google.com>, Pez Espada wrote:
> I am a biologist with strong interest in learning some beauty math and
> mix with biology. I was trying with phisicist in a Center for
> NonLinear Dynamics but I feel that I would like more the formal
> axiomatic point of mathematician viewpoint. Fot the other hand, I see
> that most 'Biomathematic' is today made from a "physicist math
> methods" and physisct viewpoint. What you suggest me about this?? For
> 'Biomathematics': classic math (Algebra, Geometry, Analysis) or
> "phisicists math methosds" (vectorial anlysis, Taylor series,
> ODEs/PDEs, complex variable, etc, etc...)??? You are all welcome,
You might find Bayesian statistics and its application to
bioinformatics more interesting than biophysics.
--
Kevin Karplus karplus at soe.ucsc.eduhttp://www.soe.ucsc.edu/~karplus
life member (LAB, Adventure Cycling, American Youth Hostels)
Effective Cycling Instructor #218-ck (lapsed)
Professor of Computer Engineering, University of California, Santa Cruz
Undergraduate and Graduate Director, Bioinformatics
Affiliations for identification only.
