[Drosophila] Re: Balancer (and researcher) Breakdown
(by Laurence.Vonkalm from ucf.edu)
Sat Mar 12 14:59:16 EST 2011
CyO is not good for balancing the tip of 2R, however SM5 is good for balancing that region. This is also based on experience and folklore.
From: dros-bounces from oat.bio.indiana.edu [mailto:dros-bounces from oat.bio.indiana.edu] On Behalf Of artyw2 from yahoo.com
Sent: Friday, March 11, 2011 11:05 PM
To: bionet-drosophila from moderators.isc.org
Subject: [Drosophila] Re: Balancer (and researcher) Breakdown
On Mar 11, 5:58 pm, sandra schulze <heterochroma... from gmail.com> wrote:
> People of Flyland....
> Could somebody out there pls tell me everything they know/have
> experienced/have any insight about balancer breakdown? Apart from what
> is in flypushing?
> I know this:
> some balancers do not balance well for specific regions (which
> balancers? which regions?) You can mitigate this annoyance by finding
> a stronger (more scrambled) balancer But if you throw in additional
> balancers (like for instance if you have to build stocks for rescue
> and such) the breakdown can be enhanced.
> So I am enjoying this urban myth for the first time in my fly-pushing
> life and it feels like I am doing mouse genetics. But when I try to
> find references to show that this exists, all I can cite is the
> relevant section in manuals like fly pushing.
> I guess I am hoping that someone out there knows of a specific
> reported case I can cite, or at least commiserate.
TM3 does not always balance the distal portion of 3L very well. I know this from personal experience. Sorry, no cites.
Dros mailing list
Dros from net.bio.net
More information about the Dros