IUBio Biosequences .. Software .. Molbio soft .. Network News .. FTP

Oral tolerance (was: immunologists read me)

Shiv A. Prasad shiv at hiv.med.umn.edu
Mon Jan 17 12:40:11 EST 1994


In article <p_travers-170194134814 at macmhc.cryst.bbk.ac.uk> p_travers at icrf.icnet.uk (Paul J Travers) writes:
>      TI: Inhibition of experimental autoimmune encephalomyelitis by
>inhalation
>          but not oral administration of the encephalitogenic peptide:
>          Influence of MHC binding affinity
>      AU: Metzler_B, Wraith_DC
>      JN: International Immunology 1993 Vol.5 No.9 pp.1159-1165 ).  And
>the use of (re)stimulation with Ag in CFA and whether the adjuvant
>overrides any hyporesponsiveness set up by oral administration of antigen. 
>Has your lab looked at stimulating with Ag in IFA to see if there is a
>difference between fed and unfed animals?
>Paul.

In EAU, Ag/IFA does not induce disease, CFA is necessary.  Therefore since we
want to study inhibition of disease we use AG/CFA.  We haven't checked any 
other adjuvants.  The results show that oral tolerance inhibits disease 
induced by Ag/CFA, but as always, inhibition is never 100%.  So it's possible
that CFA-induced inflammation might override some of the tolerance, but in
general, the tolerance mechanism seems to control the inflammation.

The Ag/IFA is an interesting idea however, perhaps the non-pathogenic T cells
(specific for the immunizing bovine Ag, not the target rat Ag) might be 
stimulated by this.

Shiv



More information about the Immuno mailing list

Send comments to us at biosci-help [At] net.bio.net