d.orsini at elsevier.nl
Mon Sep 9 16:13:01 EST 1996
From: RABBIT::RABBIT::MRGATE::"MRX_PP::1=it::2=garr::3=unisi::5=sivax::6=sestini" 9-SEP-1996 13:28
Subj: Re: ******PEER REVIEW**************
From: NAME: Piersante Sestini
FUNC: sivax <6=sestini at 5=sivax at 3=unisi at 2=garr at 1=it at MRX_PP@RABBIT at ESP>
To: NAME: Daniela Orsini
INITLS: d <DT04 at SPIDER@MRGATE>
X-Sender: sestini at sivax.unisi.it
X-Mailer: Windows Eudora Light Version 1.5.2
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
At 09.31 09/09/96 -0700, you wrote:
>How do you feel about double-blinded peer review (i.e. the reviewer
>does NOT know the author's identity and vice versa)? Do you
>think it would be difficult to avoid phrases like: "we previously
If the reviewer is in the field (as it should be), he will be
able to identify the author anyway.
But which is the problem that blinded-review is supposed to address?
More information about the Immuno