***PEER REVIEW***

[Daniela Orsini]

From:	RABBIT::RABBIT::MRGATE::"MRX_PP::1=it::2=garr::3=unisi::5=sivax::6=sestini"     9-SEP-1996 13:28
To:	SPIDER::DT04
CC:	
Subj:	Re: ******PEER REVIEW**************

From:	NAME: Piersante Sestini
	FUNC: sivax <6=sestini at 5=sivax at 3=unisi at 2=garr at 1=it at MRX_PP@RABBIT at ESP>
To:	NAME: Daniela Orsini
	FUNC: elsevier
	INITLS: d <DT04 at SPIDER@MRGATE>

RFC-822-Headers:
X-Sender: sestini at sivax.unisi.it
X-Mailer: Windows Eudora Light Version 1.5.2
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"


At 09.31 09/09/96 -0700, you wrote:
>Hi all,
>
>How do you feel about double-blinded peer review (i.e. the reviewer
>does NOT know the author's identity and vice versa)? Do you
>think it would be difficult to avoid phrases like: "we previously

If the reviewer is in the field (as it should be), he will be
able to identify the author anyway.

But which is the problem that blinded-review is supposed to address?

Piersante