Robert--
Almost all of Duesberg's claims and assertions are based on invalid
data or have been soundly refuted. As a bare-bones beginning, you
could start with an excellent treatise available at the NIH site. I
can't find the address at the moment
George M. Carter
Robert Sedaker <rsedaker at inetconn.net> wrote:
>I have been reading with great interest Dr Duesberg's book and would
>welcome rebuttles from those who do not share his views. In
>particular, I would like to know how such people would respond to
>Duesberg's claim that HIV doesn't meet Koch's Postulates? Also, Why is
>so little of the Antigen present when the T-cell count is on the wane?
>Why isn't the Antibody to HIV bound hin higher concentrations in such
>incidences? What are the latest thoughts on seronegative AIDS patients
>and seropositive People who never develope HIV? Finally, why have the
>epidemiological numbers not changed in the patient populations as
>expected (ie why no "explosion" of heterosexual exposure patients as was
>predicted-- which has been true of other bona-fide "epidemics" --
>especially in STDs)
>I think Duesberg has made some very solid observations. Still I'm not
>sure I sit well with a strictly toxocologically based theory either.....
>I appreciate thoughtful dialog.
>Thanks
>Robert Sedaker BS
