In article <6p03dc$blj$1 at 205.138.138.3>, blades at novagate.com wrote:
> People who have some reservations about vaccinations have a statistical
> basis for their concern, however vanishingly small. I wouldn't
> characterize them as 'nuts', but as persons who have had bad experiences
> with vaccination outcomes and are trying to warn others that there is a
> tiny but real risk.
The risk is real, but if you go to some of these web pages, they'd have
you believe that the risk approaches 100%. I wholeheartedly agree with
educating re risks. I don't agree with overstating them to the point that
they overshadow the greater benefits.
> That said, I agree with you that public health care would be a disaster
> without vaccinations.
T.
--
T.D. Laing
tdlaing at dres.dnd.ca
Remove "nospam" from my e-mail address in the header to reply.
All the standard disclaimers apply.
