"AIDS Treatment News" online * New Issue #302 (searchable/indexed)

johnburgin at worldnet.att.net johnburgin at worldnet.att.net
Mon Oct 5 16:43:10 EST 1998

On Mon, 05 Oct 1998 15:44:55 GMT, gmc0 at ix.netcom.com (George M.
Carter) wrote:

>johnburgin at worldnet.att.net wrote:
>>On Sun, 04 Oct 1998 19:51:51 GMT, gmc0 at ix.netcom.com (George M.
>>Carter) wrote:
>>>f.raaphorst at worldonline.nl wrote:
>>>>In article <6v5q3u$98j at sjx-ixn10.ix.netcom.com>,
>>>>  gmc0 at ix.netcom.com wrote:
>>>>> johnburgin at worldnet.att.net wrote:
>>>>> Hey dipshit!!  Get a clue!!  The dose of AZT started at 1200 mg.  Way
>>>>> too much.  People died at that dose.  It was cut to 600 mg very
>>>>> quickly.  This was in the late 80s early 90s.  That was the
>>>>> monotherapy dose.  (300 mg probably works as well). 
>>Why not use 300 then?
>Good question!  But they don't.
>> The reality is,
>>that you still haven't answered my question.  What is the dosage with
>>PI's?  600?  That's 600mg too much.
>They use 600.  Can't you read??  Well, asshole, this completely
>contradicts your lame assertion that people aren't dropping dead of
>"AZT induced AIDS" because the dosage is less.  It's not.
And who says they're not dropping dead a little slower, which is my
contention?  Who can tell the difference between a slow death with AZT
and PI's and AIDS?  Why do you keep defending a bad drug?
>>>>> though, people today are STILL taking 600 mg a day.  Same dose.
>>>>> So you're just fucking dead cold wrong and dumb as a post. 
>>Now you're trying to hurt my feelings again by using your extended
>>vocabulary(remember, a long time ago we spoke of this, after your
>>maxim of 100 usable words you start using profanity).  
>Your feelings SHOULD be hurt.  You're spreading idiocy and
>misinformation that could KILL people.  You don't like my vocabulary,
>well tough titties.
Now you're telling me how I should feel.  Boy, that's really getting
low.  My "misinformation" will only cause people to read more about
alternatives that they have not explored.  If they at the very least
look into HEAL, they will do nothing more to themselves than have
another viewpoint.  If they start with your lunacy, jumping on the
drugs, they'll be sick or dead in most cases depending on who is still
recommending AZT, like you.
>> And you
>>>>> claim to be in the medical field. 
>>No claim, I am, and you're not.
>Then god help the medical community.  Say--where are you?
>Now:  face it.  You fucked up big time again. As a member of the
>medical community, why didn't you bother to find out that people are
>taking the same (600 mg) dose of AZT?  You wouldn't have made such a
>great wanking fool out of yourself.
George, a "wanking" fool?  Not in my dictionary.  I still repeat,
600mg is 600 too much without supportive data, which is still wanking.
>		George M. Carter

More information about the Immuno mailing list