"AIDS Treatment News" online * New Issue #302 (searchable/indexed)
carlton at walleye.ccbr.umn.edu
Thu Oct 8 12:01:34 EST 1998
In article <361c31dd.121102119 at netnews.worldnet.att.net>,
<johnburgin at worldnet.att.net> wrote:
>On Wed, 07 Oct 1998 18:00:36 GMT, gmc0 at ix.netcom.com (George M.
>>>>They use 600. Can't you read?? Well, asshole, this completely
>>>>contradicts your lame assertion that people aren't dropping dead of
>>>>"AZT induced AIDS" because the dosage is less. It's not.
>>>And who says they're not dropping dead a little slower, which is my
>>>contention? Who can tell the difference between a slow death with AZT
>>>and PI's and AIDS? Why do you keep defending a bad drug?
>>Well, that makes a lot of sense. If "drugs cause AIDS" then lets add
>>MORE toxic drugs to the mix and people will die more slowly.
If you're the first, sounds good to me. jb
Does this mean that you have absolutely no intelligent response, and are
unable to marshal any facts in this argument so you are resorting to
personal attack? Brilliant strategy. Helps to confirm your stunning
critical insight, and command of the literature. Wanker.
(by the way, genius boy: you just said you would like George to
be the first to die more slowly - I am sure he is all choked up
by your warm sentiment)
More information about the Immuno