"AIDS Treatment News" online * New Issue #302 (searchable/indexed)

johnburgin at worldnet.att.net johnburgin at worldnet.att.net
Mon Oct 12 22:31:57 EST 1998

On 12 Oct 98 21:59:07 EDT, holzmr01 at mcrcr6.med.nyu.edu (ROBERT S.
HOLZMAN) wrote:

>In article <6vteq4$9jk at dfw-ixnews6.ix.netcom.com>, gmc0 at ix.netcom.com (George M. Carter) writes:
>> johnburgin at worldnet.att.net wrote:
>>>>No.  It was just dead cold wrong.  
>>>Well, have I moved off of the idiotic list, Mr Carter?  I've been
>>>upgraded to simply dead wrong?  I gave you "A" study, I can give you
>>>lots more with higher doses.  Want to keep looking foolish?
>> No, you're still an idiot, not to worry. And wrong, too.
>> As to other studies using higher doses, yes, there are.
>> But let's get to the point.'
>>>no I didn't.  I said higher doses were used than today.  Don't mislead
>>>our audience.  Remember, they can read too.
>>> that people were taking 1200 mg or some high dose until the
>>>protease inhibitors came along, then the dose dropped.  
>Dosage changed in 1989, quite a bit before PIs came along.

And, Mr Holzman, AIDS deaths dropped precipitously before PIs came
along also.  Would you like the CDC reference for that?
> -- those who don't know history are doomed to misquote it.
falsus in uno, falsus in omnibus
today is the history we talk about tomorrow, wake up! jb

More information about the Immuno mailing list