"AIDS Treatment News" online * New Issue #302 (searchable/indexed)

johnburgin at worldnet.att.net johnburgin at worldnet.att.net
Mon Oct 12 22:31:57 EST 1998


On 12 Oct 98 21:59:07 EDT, holzmr01 at mcrcr6.med.nyu.edu (ROBERT S.
HOLZMAN) wrote:

>In article <6vteq4$9jk at dfw-ixnews6.ix.netcom.com>, gmc0 at ix.netcom.com (George M. Carter) writes:
>> johnburgin at worldnet.att.net wrote:
>> 
>>>>No.  It was just dead cold wrong.  
>>>Well, have I moved off of the idiotic list, Mr Carter?  I've been
>>>upgraded to simply dead wrong?  I gave you "A" study, I can give you
>>>lots more with higher doses.  Want to keep looking foolish?
>> 
>> No, you're still an idiot, not to worry. And wrong, too.
>> 
>> As to other studies using higher doses, yes, there are.
>> 
>> But let's get to the point.'
>> 
>>>no I didn't.  I said higher doses were used than today.  Don't mislead
>>>our audience.  Remember, they can read too.
>>> that people were taking 1200 mg or some high dose until the
>>>protease inhibitors came along, then the dose dropped.  
>> 
>
>Dosage changed in 1989, quite a bit before PIs came along.

And, Mr Holzman, AIDS deaths dropped precipitously before PIs came
along also.  Would you like the CDC reference for that?
>
> -- those who don't know history are doomed to misquote it.
falsus in uno, falsus in omnibus
today is the history we talk about tomorrow, wake up! jb
>
>> 




More information about the Immuno mailing list