"AIDS Treatment News" online * New Issue #302 (searchable/indexed)
ROBERT S. HOLZMAN
holzmr01 at mcrcr6.med.nyu.edu
Mon Oct 12 20:59:07 EST 1998
In article <6vteq4$9jk at dfw-ixnews6.ix.netcom.com>, gmc0 at ix.netcom.com (George M. Carter) writes:
> johnburgin at worldnet.att.net wrote:
>>>No. It was just dead cold wrong.
>>Well, have I moved off of the idiotic list, Mr Carter? I've been
>>upgraded to simply dead wrong? I gave you "A" study, I can give you
>>lots more with higher doses. Want to keep looking foolish?
> No, you're still an idiot, not to worry. And wrong, too.
> As to other studies using higher doses, yes, there are.
> But let's get to the point.'
>>no I didn't. I said higher doses were used than today. Don't mislead
>>our audience. Remember, they can read too.
>> that people were taking 1200 mg or some high dose until the
>>protease inhibitors came along, then the dose dropped.
Dosage changed in 1989, quite a bit before PIs came along.
-- those who don't know history are doomed to misquote it.
More information about the Immuno