"AIDS Treatment News" (Medline search)

johnburgin at worldnet.att.net johnburgin at worldnet.att.net
Thu Oct 29 22:02:58 EST 1998


On 29 Oct 1998 03:38:12 GMT, flefever at ix.netcom.com(F. Frank LeFever)
wrote:

>
>This is worth repeating.
>
>I've trimmed some of the fat so Bosch's respnse to "John Burgin" is not
>obscured.  It appears that not only is "John Burgin" (real name??)
>ignorant of some basic terms, but (if we can believe him) so are his
>alleged medical colleagues and his molecular biologist (apologies
they don't need apologies, they agree with me that you're full of it
 to
>them if he misrepresents them).  Moreover, they do not know how to
>write a good
Oh, so you're the big kahuna of medline because you can drag up a few
obscure and TOTALLY UNIMPORTANT articles about "Enhancing Antibodies"?
Tell me, is that all you know?
Medline search strategy.  Bosch wrote one and found ample
>documentation of widespread use of a term "John Burgin" had ridiculed

and, continues to ridicule
>as unheard of...
because it isn't worth fooling with.  jb
>
>F. LeFever 
>
> (v. infra)
>
>
>In <marnix-2710981711360001 at bosch4.pabio.washington.edu>
>marnix at u.washington.edu (Marnix L. Bosch) writes: 
>>
>>In article <36364960.85168152 at netnews.worldnet.att.net>,
>>johnburgin at worldnet.att.net wrote:
>
>- - - - - - - -(snip) - - - - - - - - - - - -
>
>
>>> Not only are you a pompous ass, you're a defensive pompous ass. 
>Talk
>>> to me, us, about "enhancing" antibodies.  A few of my other ignorant
>>> medical colleagues, including 2 board certified medical pathologist
>>> and a molecular biologist are laughing their asses off at your
>>> bullshit.  Do you really believe that because you say something in
>>> scientific jargon that people believe it?  If they can't understand
>>> what you are saying, and they don't know who you are, why should
>they
>>> believe you?  Come on, talk to us all, o.k., just me about
>"enhancing"
>>> antibodies.  Make your case.  No references to medline searches. 
>They
>>> don't bring up the term. 
>
>
>
>>
>>PubMed search: enhancing antibodies: 421 hits; enhancing antibodies
>AND
>>HIV: 43 hits. 
>
>
>
>
>>
>>> MY stupidity is amazing?  
>>
>>Indeed
>>
>>Marnix Bosch
>




More information about the Immuno mailing list