Sequence data discussed but not deposited

[FORSDYKE at QUCDN.QueensU.CA]

   This is just the sort of thing to bring up on this bulletin board.

   It seems (i) that the editors of Science goofed in not checking that the
                data had been deposited in GenBank or elsewhere, and

           (ii) that the authors goofed (charitable interpretation) in not rem-
                bering to deposit. Surely a note from you reminding them of
                this obligation will be receive a prompt response.

       Sincerely,  Don Forsdyke (Discussion Leader. Bionet.Journals.Note)