Self-Archiving the Refereed Journal Literature

Stevan Harnad harnad at cogito.ecs.soton.ac.uk
Fri Nov 26 16:58:36 EST 1999


On Fri, 26 Nov 1999, Prof. Tom Wilson wrote:

> it is not the publishers who provide [quality control] but the rest of 
> the scholarly community acting as unpaid referees

Correct, but the publishers implement the refereeing, and that costs
some money (about $300 per paper).

> it ought to be debated whether a more economically efficient quality
> control process is to publish openly and freely without refereeing and
> rely upon the reader and user of the information to make his or her own
> quality judgements when using or deciding not to use a text.

Such a question is not settled by debating but by testing.

http://www.cogsci.soton.ac.uk/~harnad/nature2.html

And it has already been much discussed in this forum.

A complete archive of the discussion is available at the American
Scientist September Forum (98 & 99):

http://amsci-forum.amsci.org/archives/september98-forum.html

--------------------------------------------------------------------
Stevan Harnad                     harnad at cogsci.soton.ac.uk
Professor of Cognitive Science    harnad at princeton.edu
Department of Electronics and     phone: +44 23-80 592-582
Computer Science                  fax:   +44 23-80 592-865
University of Southampton         http://www.cogsci.soton.ac.uk/~harnad/
Highfield, Southampton            http://www.princeton.edu/~harnad/
SO17 1BJ UNITED KINGDOM           





More information about the Jrnlnote mailing list