Double digests of MCS's
KEITH L. STEWARD
NUM219 at NRCCAD.NRC.CA
Sat Mar 3 20:44:00 EST 1990
In a Feb 15 message posted here, John Hill <jh5f+ at andrew>
requested info on the efficiency of cutting multiple cloning sites
with two enzymes:
>One of the grad. students in our lab asked me about problems digesting
>a vector with two enzymes whose recognition sites are very close
>together (i.e., in a MCS = Multiple Cloning Site). I know that this
>situation CAN be a problem with certain enzymes. Does anyone have a
>compilation of such enzymes and their limitations? If not, does
>anyone know (or is at least reasonably certain) of example(s) of this
>behavior? If you want to e-mail me, I will post a compilation of the
>responses.
I ran into the answers the other day in an old BRL FOCUS 8:3
newsletter. An article titled 'Double Digestions of the Multiple
Cloning Site' written by Joe Crouse & Doug Amorese of BRL
described their analysis of the double digest efficiencies of the
pUC19 MCS, and presented a table summarizing their results. I
reproduce it here:
First Enzyme Second Enzyme Digestion
-------------------------------------------------------------
EcoR I Sst I C*
Kpn I C
Sma I C
BamH I C
Xba I C
Sma I Sst I C*
Kpn I N
BamH I C
Xba I C
BamH I Kpn I C
Sma I P
Xba I C
Sal I C*
Pst I C*
Pst I BamH I C*
Xba I C
Sal I N
Sph I P
Hind III P
Hind III Sph I C
Pst I C
Sal I C
Xba I C
------------------------------------------------------------
where C=complete digestion P=partial N=no digestion
*=star activity evident
Keith
+--------------------------------------------------------------------+
| Keith L. Steward, Dept. Microbiology & Immunology, Dental Sciences |
| Bldg, U. of Western Ontario, London, Ontario, Canada, N6A 5C1; |
| ph. 519-679-2111 ext 6618; BITNET: NUM219 at NRCCAD.NRC.CA |
|
+--------------------------------------------------------------------+
More information about the Methods
mailing list