Phosphoimager any experiences?

Darren Natale camdna at
Tue Dec 1 13:42:00 EST 1992

In article <ByK74s.6G6 at>, pablo at (Juan P. Abonia) writes...
>In article <1992Dec1.120555.1 at> jjw at ( Jeremy Weinman) writes:
>>We've been using the MD system for over a year now and it is great.
>>In article <SPRENGEL.92Nov28142727 at>, sprengel at (Joerg Sprengel) writes:
>>> Dear Netters,
>>> is there sombody who has experiences exposing autoradiograms (all kind
>>> of blots, sequencing gels, ...) with these machines (ie. trapping the
>>> energy derived from the radiactivity in a phosphor coated plate, and
>>> measuring the luminiscence) ?
>>Yes - we use it for virtually all of our detection applications now.  
>>Sequencing gels, Southerns, northerns, 35S protein detection, 14C metabolite
>>analysis etc...  It is very sensitive and will save you a lot of time, or
>>even permit experiments that could not be done before.  In the "new" 
>>configuration the MD machine is now rapid enough to scan and print while you 
>>wait.  Best is that you only need one exposure as you can set your image 
>What is the "new" configuration?  Is it updated software for Windows 3.1 or a
>change in the hardware?
>J. Pablo Abonia
>University at Buffalo				 BITNET:    pablo at sunybcs.BITNET
>Roswell Park Cancer Institute			 Internet:  pablo at cs.Buffalo.EDU

Both. Check out the phosphorimager after Thursday!


More information about the Methods mailing list