Spec vs Flourimeter for [DNA] ?
nishir at ohsu.edu
nishir at ohsu.edu
Wed Dec 1 15:43:41 EST 1993
In article <754686028snz at genesys.demon.co.uk> Duncan at genesys.demon.co.uk
(Duncan Clark) writes:
>In article <19931130120206.bloksber at thomashaw-at.css.msu.edu>
bloksber at pilot.msu.edu writes:
>
>>Question about the Hoefer TK100 DNA flourimeter.
>>.
>>I have 3 samples of plasmid DNA, all are subclones of the same clone in
>>pBlueScriptKS- or empty vector, all double CsCl banded, look great on gels,
>>etc. When I measure my DNA concentration on an LKB Biochrom Ultrospec II
>>spectrophotometer as A260, I get 1 set of readings and when I measure on the
>>Hoefer TK100 DNA flourimeter I get another. The 260/280 ratios are all 1.80.
>>The spec give a very consistent reading of 3x the flourimeter reading. Which
>>do I believe and why? Can anyone offer some insight or warnings? The
>>exact concentration is important to me for titrating DNA binding proteins.
>>Thanks in advance. I will post a summary of important points if warrented.
>
>I can't give am answer either way but try the following.
>
>Add a set amount of bona fide DNA ( ie commercial lambda DNA etc )to your
>samples and reassay. The spec reading should only go increase by the extra
>DNA. From memory the fluorimeter is using Hoescht dye staining. If I'm right
>that is specific for DNA and DNA alone whilst the spec will pick up RNA and
>oligos that will not be seen by the fluorimeter and may not be visible on
gels.
>I would tend to believe the fluorimeter unless the addition of extra DNA still
>gives a relative 3 fold increase in spec reading. Final thought, anyone
>accidently swapped your quartz cuvettes for something else?
>
>Happy hunting.
>
>Duncan
>--
>-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
>Duncan Clark | Internet: duncan at genesys.demon.co.uk
>GeneSys Ltd. | Compuserve: 100015.1406 at compuserve.com
>-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
We have both the
More information about the Methods
mailing list