Problems with new Sequenase?

George W Chacko gchacko at magnus.acs.ohio-state.edu
Mon Mar 1 13:48:38 EST 1993


In article <C380v2.374 at mentor.cc.purdue.edu> miguel at aclcb.purdue.edu writes:

>  A few people have now written me and the culprit seems to be
>some batches of 35S-dATP from Amersham.  I phoned Amersham and they
>took the rap.  The batch we have is 9302.  The rep. I talked to seemed 
>surprised at the batch number -- most of their complaints have been
>with 9304.  But they are replacing my mCi with batch 9308.  We'll be
>testing it and I'll post results.  

I'll keep this brief but I was using batch # 9304 too. 

George



More information about the Methods mailing list