cycle vs. normal sequencing
GR Taylor
100541.1160 at CompuServe.COM
Sun Dec 25 05:01:15 EST 1994
We wanted to do sequencing for diagnostic testing on small
(200-350base) frags. We looked at a range of kits and got really
brilliant results using USB's delta taq sequencing kit on
biotinylated cleaned up PCR prods. However since the Amersham
merger with USB it has been hard to get hold of that kit and
we've been using the Cycle kit from Epicentre with almost as good
results (slightly higher background making it more difficult to
call heterozygotes). Cycling kits require more hands on time than
T7 kits, but work better on ds tmplates, or lower concentration
templates. Sequenase is the easiest and best if you have plenty
of template, single stranded and hig purity.
More information about the Methods
mailing list