Purifying Chicken IgY
Curtis L. Ashendel
ashendel at aclcb.purdue.edu
Mon Jan 10 12:33:55 EST 1994
On Mon, 10 Jan 1994 12:33:47 GMT,
David M. Berman <images at netcom.com> wrote:
>Has anybody tried the chloroform/PEG method of antibody purification
>from egg yolk? Do these antibodies perform well? The method (Polson,
>1990, J Imm Inv) is easy and gives good yields but the original
>article uses an Ouchterlony assay as the only proof of Ig function --
>I'm a little concerned about possible effects of chloroform on the Abs
>performance in sandwich assays.
>I'd appreciate any feedback from anyone with experience in these
>matters.
>David Berman
>UT Southwestern Medical School
>Dallas, TX
As for using chloroform in the isolation, I've never tried that. We just
used the old Polson method (a differential PEG cut) which gives very high
apparent purity (>95%) and yield (grams of purified antibody per dozen eggs
if I recall). It is very easy. I have not seen the newer method and do
not know why it incorporates chloroform (except perhaps to get rid of all
that cholesterol - which is normally lost in the first PEG precipitate).
The IgY seemed rather resiliant since we could freeze-thaw repeatedly and
lyophilize without noticable change in reactivity. It is possible they are
not affected by chloroform.
As for the antibodies themselves, they work as well or better than rabbit
antisera in IPs and westerns (with the added benefit of their ease of
isolation and quantity), with two exceptions: (A) They do not react with
proteins A or G and require a second antibody, which must be made (I still
can't find any commercial antibody that works very well). (B) The hens we
immunized were vaccinated with something containing BSA and hence had
strong anti-BSA titers in preimmune eggs. Neither problem is
insurmountable, but just inconvenient enough to keep me with rabbits
whenever possible.
Curt Ashendel
Purdue University
West Lafayette, IN
ashendel at aclcb.purdue.edu
More information about the Methods
mailing list